In the January/February issue of the Spectator, Washington Spectator featured the lawsuit of Environmental Health Trust.
“With so much of the global economy riding on it, 5G has sailed into our lives without the faintest skepticism from the media or the regulators. A tiny handful of public safety advocates have pointed to numerous studies that document the serious health hazards associated with concentrated exposure to radio frequency radiation (RFR). This is the kind of radiation that is emitted by 5G networks and WiFi-assisted digital hardware—devices like cell phones, personal computers and tablets.
The FCC has insisted that its twenty-five-year-old standards for acceptable levels of exposure to RFRs are reliable, and has refused to revise them. Now a federal Appeals Court has sided with the advocacy community, and has ordered the FCC to review the growing body of peer-reviewed studies that conclude these standards are inadequate and need to be updated to protect public health. Barbara Koeppel reports.”
