Cell Tower at Schools Health Effects Safety FAQs

Cell towers, 5G and cell antennas emit a type of non-ionizing radiation called radiofrequency (RF) radiation.

The companies seem to say it is safe to put these antennas on school grounds because the radiation emissions meet federal government FCC guidelines for allowable human exposures to the public. However FCC limits do not ensure safety. Hundreds of studies show harm. Even the companies caution their shareholders of the risk.

For example, T-Mobile’s 2023 Securities and Exchange Commission filing states:

“We, along with equipment manufacturers and other carriers, are subject to current and potential future lawsuits alleging adverse health effects arising from the use of wireless handsets or from wireless transmission equipment such as cell towers.”

“In addition, the FCC has from time to time gathered data regarding wireless device emissions, and its assessment of the risks associated with using wireless devices may evolve based on its findings. Any of these allegations or changes in risk assessments could result in customers purchasing fewer devices and wireless services, could result in significant legal and regulatory liability, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, cash flows and operating results.” – T-Mobile’s 2023 Securities and Exchange Commission filing

FCC limits do not protect.

T-Mobile neglects to inform parents that it commissioned a report in entitled the Ecolog Institute Report which reviewed the science on health effects and recommended an RF exposure limit 1000x lower than the FCC’s current power density limit after reviewing the research on biological effects, including impacts to the immune system, central nervous system, hormones, cancer, neurotransmitters and fertility. (Read the T Mobile Commissioned Ecolog Report on Wireless and Health here)

Companies define the radiation as pollution.

T- Mobile’s ”Premium Handset Protection Insurance Warranty” states that their “insurance does not apply to loss or damage caused directly or indirectly” by “Pollution” which is defined in their policy as including “any artificially produced electric fields, magnetic field, electromagnetic field, sound waves, microwaves, and all artificially produced ionizing or nonionizing radiation and/or waste.”

School Districts are banning towers at schools.

U.S. school districts that have banned cell towers include:

Los Angeles California which has Resolutions opposing cell towers on school property and a “cautionary level” for radiofrequency radiation 10,000 times lower than FCC limits.
Palo Alto CA Unified School District: Resolution No. 2018-19.19 supports the City 1,500 setback and opposes cell tower “on or in close proximity to schools to ensure individuals, especially children, are protected from the potential negative effects associated with radiation exposure”
West Linn-Wilsonville Oregon School Board prohibits cell towers on school property.
Montgomery County Maryland Schools policy no longer not allow cell towers on elementary schools.
Prince George’s County Maryland School Board decided not to renew a cell tower construction master leasing agreement that had allowed over 60 schools to be marketed as cell tower sites.
Portland Oregon Schools ended new leases for cell towers.
Temecula Valley Unified School District passed a ban on new cell phone towers on school property. They also bar the district from renewing existing tower leases.

Parents are fighting to stop cell towers at school, and winning.

Parents in Pasco County, Florida, fought against a Vertex cell tower to be placed on the grounds of the Starkey Ranch K-8 School and in response, Pasco County initiated a new lease to put the monopole cell tower in the maintenance yard of Starkey District Park rather than next to the school.

“By going out and relocating this, we are now 2,348 feet from the nearest school building and 1,400 feet from the nearest housing location. So, we’re much further away from the school” – Insidetowers.com/new-cell-tower-agreement-moves-pole-further-away-from-school

Many communities restrict cell towers near schools and homes.

Shelburne, Massachusetts: 3,000 feet for schools and 1,500 feet for homes.
Copake, New York: 1,500 feet from homes, schools, churches and public buildings.
Sallisaw, Oklahoma: 1,500 feet from homes.
Stockbridge, Massachusetts: 1,000 feet for schools, playgrounds and athletic fields. 600 feet for residential.
Walnut City, California: 1,500 feet setbacks for schools, parks and residential zones.
Bar Harbor, Maine: 1500 feet setback for schools.
Bedford, New Hampshire: 750 feet from nearest residentially-zoned property.

Cell towers removed and rejected include:

A cell tower was removed in Tarrytown New York after residents protested placement near a public housing complex and playground.
In Dewey Beach, Delaware Verizon agreed to relocate beachfront cell towers after residents filed a lawsuit and founded the Save Dewey Beach Foundation.
Ocean City Maryland and Montego Bay are in lawsuits regarding their small cell tower installations.
A proposal to install a 75-foot telecommunications tower on the campus of St. John’s College was rejected.
School Board committee rejected a cell tower at Claude Thompson Elementary.
A cell tower was removed from a Ripon California elementary school after four students and three teachers were diagnosed with different forms of cancer.
A couple in Long Beach California stopped a 5G cell tower in front of their home and the initial hearing examiner determination included the statement that ” it does appear through reliable, credible evidence that the FCC regulations as to what are safe RF emission standards are outmoded and inadequate to safeguard the public…by way of said scientific medical evidence Appellants have shown that the FCC’s determination as to what are safe and acceptable RF emission exposure levels are antiquated and not based on current scientific evidence and that the FCC regulations are instead industry sponsored, outdated, and just plain wrong, causing the public to be exposed to unnecessary and harmful radiation.” The couple appealed the case until finally in 2023 they won and stopped the 5g tower.

Did you know scientists are warning on this radiation?

Hundreds of scientists are warning that safety is not assured because of numerous studies in people living near cell towers, exposed to RF radiation and in animal experiments that have found harmful effects from this type of radiation including cancer, memory impacts and oxidative stress.

The American Academy of Pediatrics says: “An Egyptian study confirmed concerns that living nearby mobile phone base stations increased the risk for developing: Headaches, Memory problems, Dizziness, Depression, Sleep problems”

Nearby cell towers increase RF radiation levels to school children.

A study of twenty kindergartens in Australia found that children in kindergartens with nearby telecommunications antenna installations had nearly three-and-a-half times higher RF radiation exposures than children with installations at least 300 meters away.

The New Hampshire State Commission on 5G Health and Environment investigated the issue of RF radiation for a year and issued a final report recommending policies to reduce children’s RF exposure including that the state enact a 1640 feet cell tower setback for homes and schools.

Since 2004, the International Association of Firefighters has officially opposed cell towers on their stations “until a study with the highest scientific merit and integrity on health effects of exposure to low-intensity RF/MW radiation is conducted and it is proven that such sitings are not hazardous to the health of our members.”

In California, firefighter unions repeatedly and successfully lobbied state lawmakers to remove fire stations from the list of 5G cell tower fast track sites.

Insurance companies will not take the risk.

Insurance company reports compare the RF radiation issue to asbestos and repeatedly rate cell tower, 5G and RF radiation as “High Risk” and this is why insurance companies exclude coverage for health damages from the RF radiation as industry standard.

Wireless companies themselves define RF radiation as a type of “pollution” in their phone protection plans for consumers.

Companies warn their shareholders of the financial risk from lawsuits related to health impacts in their annual reports but they do not warn people who live near their towers. Verizon’s Annual Report states for example, “Our wireless business also faces personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits relating to alleged health effects of wireless phones or radio frequency transmitters. We may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits. In addition, we may be required to pay significant awards or settlements.”

The school districts halting cell towers on school grounds include the Los Angeles and Palo Alto Unified California and West Linn-Wilsonville Oregon School districts which have resolutions prohibiting cell towers on school property. Montgomery County Maryland stopped new cell towers on elementary schools and Prince George’s County Maryland did not renew a leasing agreement which allowed their middle and high schools to be marketed as cell tower sites after community outrage.

The EPA School Siting Guidelines lists exposure to electromagnetic fields and the fall distance as “potential hazards” from cell towers. The EPA guidelines recommend schools “identify and evaluate cell towers within ~200 feet of prospective school locations.”

The EPA has stated that U.S. FCC RF radiation limits unchanged since 1996 do not address possible risk from long-term, nonthermal exposures.

Many experts say FCC limits allow too much RF radiation exposure to properly protect children. They caution that FCC limits do not protect against long term health effects nor do they consider children’s unique vulnerability.

The Los Angeles California School District Office of Health and Safety developed a “cautionary level” for radiofrequency radiation 10,000 times lower than FCC regulations because, “it is believed that a more conservative level is necessary to protect children, who represent a potentially vulnerable and sensitive population.”

Several countries including Italy, Israel, Russia, China and India have outdoor RF exposure limits 10 to 100 times more stringent than the US FCC limits. Numerous cell antennas now installed in front of homes and schools in the US would be prohibited in these countries because of the elevated RF radiation levels.

Download EHT’s factsheet on children, cell towers and wireless radiation health effects here.

Download EHT’s briefing on legal and liability issues of 5G and cell towers.

The Legal Handbook for Massachusetts’ Board of Health, 3rd Edition has a chapter on cell tower radiation stating “schools, houses of worship and commercial property owners can be considerable. The fact that towers are ubiquitous must not be confused with the presumption that they do not present certain health risks.” The handbook highlights the legal issues, conflicting studies and lack of consensus for safety. It is notable that studies showing adverse effects are presented:

“The world literature is more comprehensive. A study of cancer patients in Germany found a 3.29 times greater risk of cancer (p < 0.01) in patients with residence closer than 400 meters to a cell phone tower. Risk of breast cancer was 3.4 times greater, and average age of diagnosis of breast cancer was 19 years earlier.50 Similarly, a study in Israel found women living within 350 meters of a cell phone tower to have over 10 times greater risk of cancer than the community as a whole (p < 0.0001).51 More recently, in a case/control study of cancer patients residing near a cell phone transmission tower in Austria, those with external residential exposures of greater than 1000 μW/m2 (> 0.1 μW/cm2 ) had a breast cancer risk that was 23 times higher (p = 0.0007) and brain tumor risk was 121 times higher (p = 0.001) than controls.52”

Listen to the WHYY PBS coverage of the Long Beach 5G tower: How one California couple beat the future at their doorstep: a 5G cell site